From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC - draft] List of proposed future changes that are backward incompatible Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 00:49:52 -0800 Message-ID: <7viqnabwb3.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vk57ridyx.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20090216080432.GA16453@atjola.homenet> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: QUOTED-PRINTABLE Cc: david@lang.hm, git@vger.kernel.org To: =?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn?= Steinbrink X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Feb 16 09:51:43 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LYzCR-0005NO-MO for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:51:36 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756543AbZBPIuH convert rfc822-to-quoted-printable (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:50:07 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756507AbZBPIuG (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:50:06 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:48949 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756390AbZBPIuE convert rfc822-to-8bit (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:50:04 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A671F9AEBC; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:50:01 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6D7959AEB9; Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:49:55 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20090216080432.GA16453@atjola.homenet> (=?utf-8?Q?Bj=C3=B6rn?= Steinbrink's message of "Mon, 16 Feb 2009 09:04:32 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CAFFD10E-FC06-11DD-AD96-0433C92D7133-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Bj=C3=B6rn Steinbrink writes: > How about having the default in the code being a warning, but the > default for new repos being "reject"? To reserve time to manage git itself, I will try not to point people to previous discussions, but I'd like help from people who've already seen the previous discussions to do so. This is one of the things that was proposed and already shot down.