From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] builtin-blame: Reencode commit messages according to git-log rules. Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2008 00:34:05 -0700 Message-ID: <7viqrmz9jm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1224537879-13000-1-git-send-email-angavrilov@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Alexander Gavrilov X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 21 09:35:46 2008 connect(): Connection refused Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KsBmA-0004qA-UC for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 09:35:35 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753454AbYJUHeT (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:34:19 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753444AbYJUHeT (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:34:19 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:60098 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753061AbYJUHeS (ORCPT ); Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:34:18 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5211972E25; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:34:16 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-211.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1531572E23; Tue, 21 Oct 2008 03:34:11 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <1224537879-13000-1-git-send-email-angavrilov@gmail.com> (Alexander Gavrilov's message of "Tue, 21 Oct 2008 01:24:39 +0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: AA34EF02-9F42-11DD-A5E8-9CEDC82D7133-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: I think this makes sense. We'd want a testcase for the new feature before applying the patch, though.