From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Gitk and --no-walk don't play together Date: Mon, 08 Sep 2008 12:19:39 -0700 Message-ID: <7viqt6fnsk.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Santi Bejar , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jan Engelhardt X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Sep 08 21:21:08 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KcmIF-0008Oc-Qs for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:21:00 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753645AbYIHTTx (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2008 15:19:53 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753315AbYIHTTx (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2008 15:19:53 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:54518 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753208AbYIHTTw (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Sep 2008 15:19:52 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 737815FF8D; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 15:19:51 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-211.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1983D5FF89; Mon, 8 Sep 2008 15:19:46 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Jan Engelhardt's message of "Mon, 8 Sep 2008 13:25:12 -0400 (EDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 1C26AA94-7DDB-11DD-9FD6-D0CFFE4BC1C1-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jan Engelhardt writes: > On Monday 2008-09-08 12:34, Santi Bejar wrote: >> >>> in an attempt to only show only the tags in the graph, gitk barfs: >> >>Use the "List references" in the file menu. > > Nope, the intention was to have gitk display something like > > * Linux 2.6.26 > | > * Linux 2.6.25 > > without any intermediate commits. Aren't you being unreasonable? How would gitk know to draw the line between .25 and .26 without walking the history?