From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Mark Levedahl <mlevedahl@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-submodule - possibly use remote branch to describe a module
Date: Mon, 14 Apr 2008 17:39:44 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7viqyk6je7.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1208217154-992-1-git-send-email-mlevedahl@gmail.com> (Mark Levedahl's message of "Mon, 14 Apr 2008 19:52:34 -0400")
Mark Levedahl <mlevedahl@gmail.com> writes:
> Absent user intervention, git-submodule will maintain submodules as
> headless checkouts of remote branches: such checkouts cannot be described
> with reference to any local branch. So, allow describing the submodule
> using remote branches before falling back on just using the commit id.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Levedahl <mlevedahl@gmail.com>
> ---
> git-submodule.sh | 3 ++-
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/git-submodule.sh b/git-submodule.sh
> index 28509ea..af195a7 100755
> --- a/git-submodule.sh
> +++ b/git-submodule.sh
> @@ -389,7 +389,8 @@ set_name_rev () {
> cd "$1" && {
> git describe "$2" 2>/dev/null ||
> git describe --tags "$2" 2>/dev/null ||
> - git describe --contains --tags --always "$2"
> + git describe --contains "$2" 2>/dev/null ||
> + git describe --all --always "$2"
> }
> ) )
> test -z "$revname" || revname=" ($revname)"
I think the new fallback sequence makes sense, but your explanation made
sense for me only after reading it two and half times.
- The original sequence ended with "--contains --always" which always
succeeded but with an abbrevated object name. You removed --always
from it so that you can add a better last-ditch effort that uses remote
references.
Side note. Removal of --tags from it is not justified in your log
message. It is sort of obvious if you think about it, though...
- The new one at the end uses --all because the HEAD is likely to be
describable with remote references, and without --all remote reference
namespace is not searched for a match.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-04-15 0:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-04-14 23:52 [PATCH] git-submodule - possibly use remote branch to describe a module Mark Levedahl
2008-04-15 0:39 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-04-15 1:55 ` Mark Levedahl
2008-04-15 2:19 ` Mark Levedahl
2008-04-15 2:48 ` [PATCH] git-submodule - possibly use branch name " Mark Levedahl
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7viqyk6je7.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mlevedahl@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).