From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] apply: fix segfault
Date: Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:28:45 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vir0v6pjm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <7vprv36qkt.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (Junio C. Hamano's message of "Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:06:26 -0800")
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
> Johannes Schindelin <Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de> writes:
>
>> When the patch reports a line number that is larger than the number of
>> lines in the current version of the file, git-apply used to segfault.
>
> I have to wonder if the correct fix should be like this
> instead. Under that condition, I think computation of the
> initial "try" value already oversteps the line[] array for the
> original image.
With tests...
builtin-apply.c | 3 ++
t/t4105-apply-fuzz.sh | 60 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 63 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/builtin-apply.c b/builtin-apply.c
index 2b8ba81..177f541 100644
--- a/builtin-apply.c
+++ b/builtin-apply.c
@@ -1809,6 +1809,9 @@ static int find_pos(struct image *img,
else if (match_end)
line = img->nr - preimage->nr;
+ if (line > preimage->nr)
+ line = preimage->nr;
+
try = 0;
for (i = 0; i < line; i++)
try += img->line[i].len;
diff --git a/t/t4105-apply-fuzz.sh b/t/t4105-apply-fuzz.sh
new file mode 100755
index 0000000..9c2a9f5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/t/t4105-apply-fuzz.sh
@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+#!/bin/sh
+
+test_description='apply with fuzz and offset'
+
+. ./test-lib.sh
+
+dotest () {
+
+ name="$1" && shift &&
+
+ test_expect_success "$name" "
+ git checkout-index -f -q -u file &&
+ git apply $* &&
+ diff -u expect file
+ "
+
+}
+
+test_expect_success setup '
+
+ for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
+ do
+ echo $i
+ done >file &&
+ git update-index --add file &&
+ for i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 a b c d e 8 9 10 11 12
+ do
+ echo $i
+ done >file &&
+ cat file >expect &&
+ git diff >O0.diff &&
+
+ sed -e "s/@@ -5,6 +5,11 @@/@@ -2,6 +2,11 @@/" >O1.diff O0.diff &&
+ sed -e "s/@@ -5,6 +5,11 @@/@@ -7,6 +7,11 @@/" >O2.diff O0.diff &&
+ sed -e "s/@@ -5,6 +5,11 @@/@@ -19,6 +19,11 @@/" >O3.diff O0.diff &&
+
+ sed -e "s/^ 5/ S/" >F0.diff O0.diff &&
+ sed -e "s/^ 5/ S/" >F1.diff O1.diff &&
+ sed -e "s/^ 5/ S/" >F2.diff O2.diff &&
+ sed -e "s/^ 5/ S/" >F3.diff O3.diff
+
+'
+
+dotest 'unmodified patch' O0.diff
+
+dotest 'minus offset' O1.diff
+
+dotest 'plus offset' O2.diff
+
+dotest 'big offset' O3.diff
+
+dotest 'fuzz with no offset' -C2 F0.diff
+
+dotest 'fuzz with minus offset' -C2 F1.diff
+
+dotest 'fuzz with plus offset' -C2 F2.diff
+
+dotest 'fuzz with big offset' -C2 F3.diff
+
+test_done
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-02-11 23:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-02-11 22:28 [PATCH] apply: fix segfault Johannes Schindelin
2008-02-11 23:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-02-11 23:28 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-02-11 23:48 ` Junio C Hamano
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vir0v6pjm.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=Johannes.Schindelin@gmx.de \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).