From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Should "pull --rebase" try to be a little cleverer? Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:21:02 -0800 Message-ID: <7vir1nxcoh.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jan 21 19:21:47 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JH1HG-0000se-Sy for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 19:21:47 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751907AbYAUSVQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:21:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751906AbYAUSVQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:21:16 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:55170 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751797AbYAUSVQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:21:16 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C37D45D4; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:21:12 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CD6DE45D0; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 13:21:09 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:47:13 +0000 (GMT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > However, if we already have refs/remotes/blabla/master, we could DWIM the > --rebase call to > > git rebase --onto FETCH_HEAD refs/remotes/blabla/master FWIW, I like it, and I think that is what users expect it to do.