From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] detached HEAD -- finishing touches Date: Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:30:40 -0800 Message-ID: <7virelmjlr.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20070131231942.GB31145@coredump.intra.peff.net> <20070201030030.GA1979@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7vd54ur26u.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vlkjip7mu.fsf_-_@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20070201215242.GA1775@thunk.org> <7v64alnz2q.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <87ejp99wn7.wl%cworth@cworth.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Theodore Tso , Jeff King , Nicolas Pitre , git@vger.kernel.org To: Carl Worth X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Feb 02 02:30:47 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HCnGH-0006gz-In for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 02 Feb 2007 02:30:45 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423060AbXBBBam (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 20:30:42 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423061AbXBBBam (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 20:30:42 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtai18.cox.net ([68.230.241.41]:61921 "EHLO fed1rmmtao105.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423060AbXBBBam (ORCPT ); Thu, 1 Feb 2007 20:30:42 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070202013041.QMBF1302.fed1rmmtao105.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Thu, 1 Feb 2007 20:30:41 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id JRWg1W00g1kojtg0000000; Thu, 01 Feb 2007 20:30:41 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87ejp99wn7.wl%cworth@cworth.org> (Carl Worth's message of "Thu, 01 Feb 2007 17:27:24 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Carl Worth writes: > And that's why I proposed a checkout away from detached head just > printing the name of the commit that was being left. > > Is there any other precious information that that solution would not > address? I do not think of any offhand, but "did we make commit since we detached HEAD" was not a suggestion I made, so what I can think of does not matter much ;-).