From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Check that a tag exists using show-ref instead of looking for the ref file. Date: Tue, 03 Oct 2006 13:26:30 -0700 Message-ID: <7virj1m9hl.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20061001223304.d37df36f.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> <7vlknxrcja.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <200610032211.05847.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Oct 03 22:27:25 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GUqqY-0001uu-JJ for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 03 Oct 2006 22:26:35 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030324AbWJCU0b (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:26:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030326AbWJCU0b (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:26:31 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net ([68.230.241.28]:2552 "EHLO fed1rmmtao11.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030324AbWJCU0b (ORCPT ); Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:26:31 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20061003202630.ITGH13992.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Tue, 3 Oct 2006 16:26:30 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id VwSQ1V00F1kojtg0000000 Tue, 03 Oct 2006 16:26:24 -0400 To: Christian Couder In-Reply-To: <200610032211.05847.chriscool@tuxfamily.org> (Christian Couder's message of "Tue, 3 Oct 2006 22:11:05 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Christian Couder writes: > Junio C Hamano wrote: >> Thanks. We also need this to avoid refetching already packed >> tags. > > Yeah, I did a very quick check on the shell scripts and I obviously missed > some places that need updates. > > In fact, I couldn't resist to start implementing the deleted-refs/$frotz~ref > stuff we talked about... How would that help? We need to audit the existing scripts since they would not look under $GIT_DIR/deleted-refs currently anyway.