From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
Cc: Shawn Pearce <spearce@spearce.org>,
Jon Smirl <jonsmirl@gmail.com>,
git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Mozilla .git tree
Date: Sat, 02 Sep 2006 13:53:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7virk6yopp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.64.0609021151280.27779@g5.osdl.org
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org> writes:
> On Sat, 2 Sep 2006, Shawn Pearce wrote:
>
>> I think Junio and Nico have already agreed to change the base SHA1
>> to be an offset instead;
I am not in favor of that, at least not yet, especially I
haven't thought about the implications of that on streaming
unpacker. I do not have much objections about changing
base-delta order, though.
> Of course, if we change the pack/index-file format for other reasons, then
> we should obviously fix the 4G issue at the same time, but were there
> actually any real other reasons at this point?
Not really, from my point of view. Probably 70% of motivation
of the new \377tOc index format originally came from wanting to
have "where is the end of this object" which turned out to be
unneeded; and by making repack easier to use I think we do not
have to solve 4G issue either.
There is only one case that might need a single pack that can be
indexed with 4G offset: initial clone or repack of a huge
repository.
--
VGER BF report: U 0.788936
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-02 20:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 52+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <9e4733910608290943g6aa79855q62b98caf4f19510@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20060829165811.GB21729@spearce.org>
[not found] ` <9e4733910608291037k2d9fb791v18abc19bdddf5e89@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20060829175819.GE21729@spearce.org>
[not found] ` <9e4733910608291155g782953bbv5df1b74878f4fcf1@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20060829190548.GK21729@spearce.org>
[not found] ` <9e4733910608291252q130fc723r945e6ab906ca6969@mail.gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20060829232007.GC22935@spearce.org>
[not found] ` <9e4733910608291807q9b896e4sdbfaa9e49de58c2b@mail.gmail.com>
2006-08-30 1:51 ` Mozilla .git tree Shawn Pearce
2006-08-30 2:25 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-08-30 2:58 ` Jon Smirl
2006-08-30 3:10 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-08-30 3:27 ` Jon Smirl
2006-08-30 5:53 ` Nicolas Pitre
2006-08-30 11:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-01 7:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 1:19 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-02 4:01 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 4:39 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-02 11:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 14:20 ` Jon Smirl
2006-09-02 17:39 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-02 18:56 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-02 20:53 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2006-09-02 17:44 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-02 2:04 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-02 11:02 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 17:51 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-02 20:55 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-03 3:54 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-01 17:45 ` A Large Angry SCM
2006-09-01 18:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-01 19:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-01 23:14 ` [PATCH] pack-objects: re-validate data we copy from elsewhere Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 0:23 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-02 1:39 ` VGER BF report? Johannes Schindelin
2006-09-02 5:58 ` Sam Ravnborg
2006-09-02 1:52 ` [PATCH] pack-objects: re-validate data we copy from elsewhere Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 3:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 4:52 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-02 9:42 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 17:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-02 10:09 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 17:54 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-03 21:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-04 4:10 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-04 5:50 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-04 6:44 ` Shawn Pearce
2006-09-04 7:39 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-03 0:27 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-03 0:32 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-05 8:12 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-02 18:43 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-02 20:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-03 21:48 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-03 22:00 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-03 22:16 ` Linus Torvalds
2006-09-03 22:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-04 4:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2006-09-04 15:19 ` Linus Torvalds
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7virk6yopp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net \
--to=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jonsmirl@gmail.com \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
--cc=torvalds@osdl.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).