From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: expensive local git clone Date: Mon, 04 Jul 2005 16:07:41 -0700 Message-ID: <7virzqgog2.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20050704204235.GE21128@pasky.ji.cz> <20050704.140043.112609056.davem@davemloft.net> <7v7jg6i72c.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20050704.154933.104033112.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: junkio@cox.net, torvalds@osdl.org, git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 05 01:08:41 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([12.107.209.244]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Dpa3A-0007rB-Eb for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 05 Jul 2005 01:08:28 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S261727AbVGDXIS (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jul 2005 19:08:18 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S261731AbVGDXIS (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jul 2005 19:08:18 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao02.cox.net ([68.230.241.37]:62121 "EHLO fed1rmmtao02.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261727AbVGDXII (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Jul 2005 19:08:08 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.60.172]) by fed1rmmtao02.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.04.00 201-2131-118-20041027) with ESMTP id <20050704230741.QCOM22430.fed1rmmtao02.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Mon, 4 Jul 2005 19:07:41 -0400 To: "David S. Miller" In-Reply-To: <20050704.154933.104033112.davem@davemloft.net> (David S. Miller's message of "Mon, 04 Jul 2005 15:49:33 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1007 (Gnus v5.10.7) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "DSM" == David S Miller writes: DSM> Looks interesting. Any particular reason to use "cpio" DSM> instead of "cp"? No particular reason other than I am just used to doing things that way.