From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 10/14] http: use hostname in credential description Date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 10:16:36 -0700 Message-ID: <7vk4anzuvf.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20110718074642.GA11678@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20110718075232.GJ12341@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vr55k4mxn.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20110722204749.GC11922@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vbowmx9da.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20110722221337.GA15753@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, spearce@spearce.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Aug 08 19:16:46 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QqTRU-0007zu-Pr for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2011 19:16:45 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752921Ab1HHRQk (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2011 13:16:40 -0400 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:53713 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751703Ab1HHRQj (ORCPT ); Mon, 8 Aug 2011 13:16:39 -0400 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0959241A1; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 13:16:39 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=aN75xLY7QvW0ldWmqPUuLYcF7uU=; b=NOAuxb ZIzpr2g7MR2sLlJssGDheUeXSbGGqz5dqtmt21DAC8TY/HOsgoNmDrMd+wdXInIo bq5j30PLfrn8Q5BC09fCLnI4b1jCG0Okb+rVq1qZkZjb9IBzJh9QAE3jxReCj2oG 584rtI+F14qLX9wxzhY7lafZdFI4eGJmQaol8= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=CvCyjXncKE/uUwRRN+XlBUKOQnYMx1vs XWgzSDvCY59C1MUDu+jd3wGSBNFRpzjLTYkWztuU/ZCXJOa9XykEkeuxGCdpThbw JBQZaCRTj8H7ko5sys7sbjj7rf4CACK56+NzaeGDNKdjiGSlORi0T/u2cNUwERv9 7zQDgiyuJrw= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3E7D41A0; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 13:16:38 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [76.102.170.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75B8A419E; Mon, 8 Aug 2011 13:16:38 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20110722221337.GA15753@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Fri, 22 Jul 2011 16:13:38 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 2D1F8FF2-C1E2-11E0-B2B4-1DC62E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > I expect those cases to be even less common, of course, but it's nice > that it's straightforward to support them. > >> > I tried to optimize for the common case (many repos under one identity) >> > than the uncommon (many identities under one host). >> >> As I am not convinced if this statement is true. > > I admit I don't have any data beyond my own experiences. GitHub tends > towards the concept of a single identity, and it has some group > management. I don't know about other sites, though. Do you have any > specific examples in mind? I think I heard Shawn talk about Gerrit installations where multiple instances that serve separate userbases are behind a shared Apache front-end that would be problematic with this limitation.