From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Command-line interface thoughts Date: Mon, 06 Jun 2011 07:00:16 -0700 Message-ID: <7vk4cz9i1b.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <201106051311.00951.jnareb@gmail.com> <7vwrgza3i2.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4DEC8322.6040200@drmicha.warpmail.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Scott Chacon , Jakub Narebski , Michael Nahas , git@vger.kernel.org To: Michael J Gruber X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jun 06 16:00:37 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QTaM7-0004VP-TE for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 16:00:36 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754005Ab1FFOAb (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:00:31 -0400 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:53951 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750877Ab1FFOAa (ORCPT ); Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:00:30 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 30B6740E7; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:02:41 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=gkRT2XpdtY0JN24eh3VGmUSp1ik=; b=j003/c R1bQQHBNOF/DwvatmqcmTq1Nk0hmtJVDJV8C5bxz7RnS5dZ9zLVZWgmufN2GV9o7 ir8es4COz/0hSyIgZDccV7sCc33LNlHuWyDHUiBRA0sjksGIYzEXPVEBqShABCJN xlY8BgekBcH4OZ/r3KeRdR6RF9VNrzaUKydhY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=g5NZ2814ntQLxm01PWO3PNe5fxQTLZne xMk+b5aDn2o9DXGeXXY6T/ITXWlbchG1nIOoLA9LckC0mtPIb778I8RkCp2yAj5i Cg0hfsYup/se4FexsjtZ1ZHWBDO+9s198hYCbAWUCi9WHrStlPnPbH6HlVJuuMZD 37jFGGmbKus= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF12C40E0; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:02:35 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [76.102.170.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B92F40D2; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 10:02:29 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4DEC8322.6040200@drmicha.warpmail.net> (Michael J. Gruber's message of "Mon, 06 Jun 2011 09:34:58 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A17DF25E-9045-11E0-B206-EA23C7C1A288-77302942!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Michael J Gruber writes: > Junio C Hamano venit, vidit, dixit 06.06.2011 08:16: > ... >> For example, how would you design the user experience of "git show NEXT"? >> Try to write a transcript (i.e. "The user starts from this state, runs >> these commands, and then says 'git show NEXT'. The user will see this."), >> covering various corner cases exhaustively, including what would happen >> before the first commit, and during a conflicted "pull" or "rebase -i". >> ... > That is why the other Michael suggested "NEXT" as opposed to "INDEX": That is why I asked what the user experience of "git show NEXT" as opposed to "git show INDEX" should look like. So what should it look like during a "pull" that did not finish?