From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: gsoc - Better git log --follow support Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 11:12:37 -0700 Message-ID: <7vk4fpemei.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20110321122407.GH16334@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20110323162023.GC30337@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7v8vw5g4f0.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20110323170655.GA4392@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Micha=C5=82_=C5=81owicki?= , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Mar 23 19:13:02 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2SYB-0001D9-Ii for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 19:12:55 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932487Ab1CWSMu (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:12:50 -0400 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:49541 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932080Ab1CWSMt (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:12:49 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6AC744D44; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:14:28 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=0ihtT8GmcAC76zszmHXpmc+OmD4=; b=AVDY8E eR1WvmyARpkGQOIcpaFRybXymE2o78on6XknLrniRFFPj+XCojNk/Ywx6xifD5UZ aZTi3g5Fc1KxbyTlzX5anpoZYWzzt+zgqt+yQ1HBtP3ZvoVwYQTrFXuwJUq1B+JM kwURrmQu+7Vqz/mJ8e63jTZZ2ji18aiDgbyic= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=Qv+FtBkbmVoagX+xwHin65ltOVKDYaGh t0Opn0YgORWg3OctpqtrsfyNh4fvJbZpvJ8onvy1QX9SWiWOqp/PgOHpqurdM2kT BpXjb2hBZ4IRci3Nc4fB74/QfpBGVl83qjQLmG/GF5FTJBKpUrdjwIC/mWF7Yb+A 7LlH1sEEeOc= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3967F4D43; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:14:24 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [76.102.170.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 259604D3C; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 14:14:19 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20110323170655.GA4392@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Wed, 23 Mar 2011 13:06:55 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 61D0432A-5579-11E0-9107-E8AB60295C12-77302942!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > Obviously a solution that always provides an exact right answer is > preferable to "pretty good results", but we'd have to keep in mind the > performance difference. And that is why the current --follow hack was declared to be good enough to give "pretty good results" by its inventor, no? I still agree with it personally, and if we _were_ to improve it out of "hack" status, we should aim to do the right thing (provided if there is a "right thing" exists).