From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] git-send-email.perl: Deduplicate "to:" and "cc:" entries with names Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 16:25:18 -0800 Message-ID: <7vk4jzpq8h.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1290272809.27951.30.camel@Joe-Laptop> <1290286877.31117.15.camel@Joe-Laptop> <4CE84FF3.2070906@pcharlan.com> <1290294365.31117.40.camel@Joe-Laptop> <7vmxowq6gz.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <1290807268.11971.310.camel@Joe-Laptop> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Pete Harlan , Andreas Schwab , git To: Joe Perches X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Nov 27 01:26:06 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PM8c9-0008UL-8B for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Sat, 27 Nov 2010 01:26:05 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752031Ab0K0AZb (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2010 19:25:31 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:57089 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751625Ab0K0AZb (ORCPT ); Fri, 26 Nov 2010 19:25:31 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95ADA276E; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 19:25:46 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=YPVrlqUSoE/LBEzJHEYd9jf9jK4=; b=BxA0u8 kkOhLTlyr3tDK02+bOvXYrIiiaGy22RyjYxb7iLqTxKQW7nAce3qKfVanjccry1I 2QlRgBviz4QrBo2/KBES6JmzuXZ9mZABY4Yfh8eT0kwAXmxKxta7C9jtMlNCYCDy yHn+hIRoj2JiiDSrxhCKHISy8mik1K/lE7KWY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=OZoATj2NdnbiKldKdMUz5OjTcwBu61re wMl4Wdx+1LLA1E6EmgwDX1UmrmQQCNZTi7ONlgtZ03l2m6froCDRvWa13PazPNIL 0PUtteNks8kWGHqFioYR2M61atGAimrLbJTsam0R3j/V8ZLwZ/gi8p8EiULELhW7 wGmqXLLb5Gc= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FF312768; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 19:25:42 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [76.102.170.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B65C72766; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 19:25:36 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1290807268.11971.310.camel@Joe-Laptop> (Joe Perches's message of "Fri\, 26 Nov 2010 13\:34\:28 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: DE47CC0C-F9BC-11DF-A559-DF8536391E49-77302942!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Joe Perches writes: > On Fri, 2010-11-26 at 10:34 -0800, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> I wonder if we should remove addresses from To: and Cc: if the same >> address appears in @bcclist, by the way, but that is a separate topic. > > Most likely it should be culled from the bcclist. That means that the current behaviour is Ok, no? We do make the "RCPT TO" list of addresses we feed to smtp unique after concatenating To/Cc/Bcc, if I am not mistaken.