Re: What's cooking in git.git (Oct 2009, #01; Wed, 07)

[Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>]

Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:

> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
>> --------------------------------------------------
>> [New Topics]
>
>> * jn/gitweb-patch (2009-09-30) 1 commit
>>  - gitweb: Do not show 'patch' link in 'commit' view for merges
>> 
>> jk: After some comments with Jakub, I think the code is right but he
>> promised a re-roll with more in the commit message.
>
> Not only better commit message, but a more complete patch as well.

Ok; I'll wait.

>> * mr/gitweb-snapshot (2009-09-26) 2 commits
>>  - gitweb: append short hash ids to snapshot files
>>  - gitweb: check given hash before trying to create snapshot
>> 
>> jk: He posted a v5 of his series. I didn't look at it closely, but Jakub
>> ack'd it.
> ...
> In short: first patch is a go, second needs more work.

Ok; I'll merge fdb0c36 (gitweb: check given hash before trying to create
snapshot, 2009-09-26) to 'next'.

>> * jc/pretty-lf (2009-10-04) 1 commit
>>  - Pretty-format: %[+-]x to tweak inter-item newlines
>> 
>> I am not happy with this one yet.  I am contemplating to introduce a new
>> syntax "%[magic(param)<anything>%]" to generalize expressions of this and
>> line wrapping features in an extensible way.
>> ...
> So... it is magic %[...%] or %{...} or %{...%}?

The escape does not matter. %() is fine, too.  It is non-essential for the
purpose of the upcoming release so I have backburnered coming up with and
thinking the details through.

>> --------------------------------------------------
>> [Cooking]
>
>> * jn/gitweb-show-size (2009-09-07) 1 commit
>>  - gitweb: Add 'show-sizes' feature to show blob sizes in tree view
>
> What this one requires (beside better name for a feature)?

Name before 'next', and then the usual cooking, I guess.

>> * jn/gitweb-blame (2009-09-01) 5 commits
>> ...
>> Ajax-y blame.
>
> I reordered patches so JSMIN one is first (as it is less
> controversial), but the 'create blame_incremental links' one needs
> more work.

Ok; I'll wait.

Thanks.