From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] gittutorial: remove misleading note Date: Fri, 23 Jan 2009 11:00:18 -0800 Message-ID: <7vk58lvoe5.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1232733749-6120-1-git-send-email-vmiklos@frugalware.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Miklos Vajna X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Jan 23 20:02:25 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1LQRHp-0007He-Lj for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 20:01:50 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753437AbZAWTAZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:00:25 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753397AbZAWTAZ (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:00:25 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:53613 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753035AbZAWTAY (ORCPT ); Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:00:24 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CECC1D218; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:00:23 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 3142F1D217; Fri, 23 Jan 2009 14:00:20 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1232733749-6120-1-git-send-email-vmiklos@frugalware.org> (Miklos Vajna's message of "Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:02:29 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 164FDA4E-E980-11DD-9704-BE78113D384A-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Miklos Vajna writes: > In the tutorial Alice initializes the repository, and Bob clones it. So > Bob can just do a 'git pull', but Alice will need 'git pull > '. > > The note suggested that the branch parameter is not necessary, which is > no longer true these days. So we have a usability regression here. Perhaps we need to fix that instead?