From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [take 2] git send-email updates
Date: Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:14:20 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vk5b9x0kj.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20081111221351.GE10073@artemis.corp> (Pierre Habouzit's message of "Tue, 11 Nov 2008 23:13:51 +0100")
Pierre Habouzit <madcoder@debian.org> writes:
> Oh you mean that if one use --no-format-patch you don't wan't _any_
> option to be passed to format-patch?
The option name --no-format-patch sounded like "I do not want you to act
as a frontend, ever", i.e. if you type master..next by mistake on the
command line, the command would barf when the option is given. Not even
"pass to format-patch", but "do not run format-patch to begin with".
It is not a big deal especially for interactive use (and that is why I
said "somewhat" unfortunate).
> If we're really doing this, then maybe we want a 5-state kind of option:
> 1 disallow any file name ;
> 2 if conflict, chose the revision ;
> 3 barf if any conflict arises (default) ;
> 4 if conflict chose the file ;
> 5 disallow any kind of revision argument.
>
> My proposal implements 2 as --format-patch, 3 as default, and 4 as
> --no-format-patch. You propose basically (5) for --no-format-patch
> instead, well I say this makes sense, but it's somehow "sad" not to have
> (1) too in that case.
Actually, "send-email --format-patch master..fixes Documentation/" may be
a useful command to send out only documentation fixes. For such a usage,
Documentation/ should not be taken as a maildir. If we would want to
support such usage (and I'd say why not), a token can fall into one (or
two) of three categories:
- can it be a rev?
- is it a tracked path (either blob or a leading dir)?
- is it a file/dir that is not tracked?
The first two would be format-patch candidate. The last one is the
traditional mail source. Because the latter two are disjoint set, and
because it does not matter if you have a tracked file 'master' and a
branch 'master' in your repo (either will be passed to format-patch
anyway), the actual disambiguity is reduced, but it still is different
from what you have in your patch, I suspect.
As to options, how about doing this:
--no-format-patch means never ever run format-patch, behave exactly as
before;
--format-patch means what you have in your patch. guess and favor
format-patch parameter when ambiguous;
without either option, guess and favor mbox/maildir but still run
format-patch if remaining parameters and options need to
(e.g. "send-email my-cover-letter origin/master..master" will find
my-cover-letter which is not tracked and take it as mbox, and grab
patches from commits between origin/master..master, and send all of
them).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-11-12 0:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 62+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-10-31 10:57 git send-email improvements Pierre Habouzit
2008-10-31 10:57 ` [PATCH 1/3] git send-email: avoid leaking directory file descriptors Pierre Habouzit
2008-10-31 10:57 ` [PATCH 2/3] git send-email: interpret unknown files as revision lists Pierre Habouzit
2008-10-31 10:57 ` [PATCH 3/3] git send-email: add --annotate option Pierre Habouzit
2008-10-31 21:34 ` Ian Hilt
2008-11-02 6:23 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-02 9:51 ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-03 12:18 ` Matthieu Moy
2008-10-31 16:52 ` [PATCH] git send-email: allow any rev-list option as an argument Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-02 4:35 ` Jeff King
2008-11-02 9:39 ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-02 18:02 ` Jeff King
2008-11-03 9:15 ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-04 1:04 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-04 8:19 ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-02 4:31 ` [PATCH 1/3] git send-email: avoid leaking directory file descriptors Jeff King
2008-10-31 12:36 ` Further enhancement proposal for git-send-email Pierre Habouzit
2008-10-31 12:36 ` [PATCH 1/3] git send-email: make the message file name more specific Pierre Habouzit
2008-10-31 12:36 ` [PATCH 2/3] git send-email: do not ask questions when --compose is used Pierre Habouzit
2008-10-31 12:36 ` [PATCH 3/3] git send-email: turn --compose on when more than one patch Pierre Habouzit
2008-10-31 21:33 ` [PATCH 2/3] git send-email: do not ask questions when --compose is used Ian Hilt
2008-10-31 21:38 ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-10-31 22:01 ` Ian Hilt
2008-11-01 2:26 ` Ian Hilt
2008-11-01 11:04 ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-01 13:00 ` Ian Hilt
2008-11-01 17:08 ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-01 17:34 ` Francis Galiegue
2008-11-01 17:43 ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-01 19:56 ` Francis Galiegue
2008-11-01 17:54 ` Ian Hilt
2008-11-02 6:18 ` [PATCH 1/3] git send-email: make the message file name more specific Junio C Hamano
2008-11-02 9:35 ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-02 21:34 ` Ian Hilt
2008-11-03 8:53 ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-04 16:24 ` [take 2] git send-email updates Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-04 16:24 ` [PATCH 1/5] git send-email: make the message file name more specific Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-04 16:24 ` [PATCH 2/5] git send-email: interpret unknown files as revision lists Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-04 16:24 ` [PATCH 3/5] git send-email: add --annotate option Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-04 16:24 ` [PATCH 4/5] git send-email: ask less questions when --compose is used Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-04 16:24 ` [PATCH 5/5] git send-email: turn --compose on when more than one patch Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-04 23:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-05 3:31 ` Jeff King
2008-11-05 7:03 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-05 10:40 ` [PATCH 2/5] git send-email: interpret unknown files as revision lists Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-05 15:17 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-09 18:56 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-04 20:09 ` [PATCH 4/5] git send-email: ask less questions when --compose is used Francis Galiegue
2008-11-04 23:54 ` Junio C Hamano
2008-11-04 23:54 ` [PATCH 2/5] git send-email: interpret unknown files as revision lists Junio C Hamano
2008-11-10 23:53 ` [take 2] git send-email updates Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-10 23:53 ` [PATCH 1/4] git send-email: make the message file name more specific Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-10 23:54 ` [PATCH 2/4] git send-email: interpret unknown files as revision lists Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-10 23:54 ` [PATCH 3/4] git send-email: add --annotate option Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-10 23:54 ` [PATCH 4/4] git send-email: ask less questions when --compose is used Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-12 5:48 ` [PATCH 2/4] git send-email: interpret unknown files as revision lists Junio C Hamano
2008-11-11 20:30 ` [take 2] git send-email updates Junio C Hamano
2008-11-11 22:13 ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-12 0:14 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-11-13 0:01 ` Re* " Junio C Hamano
2008-11-15 22:07 ` Pierre Habouzit
2008-11-15 22:05 ` Pierre Habouzit
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vk5b9x0kj.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=madcoder@debian.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).