From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Michal Vitecek <fuf@mageo.cz>
Cc: git list <git@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFH] git cherry-pick takes forever
Date: Wed, 10 Sep 2008 03:00:20 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vk5dkxqvf.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20080910082610.GA3144@mageo.cz> (Michal Vitecek's message of "Wed, 10 Sep 2008 10:26:10 +0200")
Michal Vitecek <fuf@mageo.cz> writes:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I have two git repositories: one is the origin of the other. However no
> merging is being done as the projects in the repositories quite differ
> but still use the same core. So to propagate changes I cherry-pick
> those which are useful from one repository to another.
>
> however 'git cherry-pick' has lately started to last almost forever:
Can you define "lately"? Is it a function of your git version, or is it a
function of the age of your repositories?
> $ time git cherry-pick b42b77e66a83f1298d9900a9bb1078b9b42e8618
> Finished one cherry-pick.
> Created commit 7caef83: - removed some superfluous newlines
> 2 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> git cherry-pick b42b77e66a83f1298d9900a9bb1078b9b42e8618 282.97s user 34.69s system 100% cpu 5:17.63 total
>
> Both repositories have approximately 16k commits and their forking
> point (merge base) is 250 to 490 commits far away.
When talking about cherry-pick, the size of the history (unless the
repository has too many objects and badly packed) does not matter; the
operation is purely about your current state, the cherry-picked commit
itself, and the parent commit of the cherry-picked one.
Taking 5 minutes to cherry-pick a change to only two paths, one line
deletion each, is plain ridiculous, but if the tree state of cherry-picked
commit and the tree state of the target is vastly different (e.g. almost
no common pathnames), the behaviour is certainly understandable. Ancient
git used straight three-way merge for cherry-pick, but recent ones use
more expensive "recursive-merge", which tries to detect renames. If the
states of trees are very dissimilar, you can end up wasting a lot of time.
$ H=$(git rev-parse 7caef83^) ;# the commit before cherry-pick
$ C=b42b77e6 ;# the cherry-picked one
cherry-pick operation roughly runs these two diffs:
$ time git diff --shortstat -M $H $C
$ time git diff --shortstat -M $H $C^1
and uses the result to perform its work. Can you clock these?
If you rarely have renames, it may be much more efficient to run "git
format-patch -1 --stdout $C | git am -3" instead of cherry-pick.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-09-10 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-09-10 8:26 [RFH] git cherry-pick takes forever Michal Vitecek
2008-09-10 10:00 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2008-09-11 7:56 ` Michal Vitecek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vk5dkxqvf.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=fuf@mageo.cz \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).