From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-rerere.txt: Mention rr-cache directory Date: Tue, 08 Jul 2008 18:09:47 -0700 Message-ID: <7vk5fvq2w4.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1215562653-5043-1-git-send-email-s-beyer@gmx.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Stephan Beyer , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Jul 09 03:10:59 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KGOCv-00008O-Qn for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 09 Jul 2008 03:10:58 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751050AbYGIBJ7 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2008 21:09:59 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750986AbYGIBJ6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2008 21:09:58 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:46151 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750956AbYGIBJ6 (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Jul 2008 21:09:58 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA80216C71; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 21:09:56 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0DF3516C6F; Tue, 8 Jul 2008 21:09:50 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Wed, 9 Jul 2008 02:38:15 +0200 (CEST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: BEAB61E6-4D53-11DD-AE66-CE28B26B55AE-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > Of course, this only holds true when the config is read, i.e. when > setup_rerere() was called in time. Which is the case when you call > rerere() (as is done both from cmd_rerere() as well as cmd_commit()). > > Of course, I haven't tested it. Other than running the test script, that > is. > > So care to elaborate what is going wrong? Very interesting question indeed.