From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] gc: call "prune --expire 2.weeks.ago" Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2008 16:41:54 -0700 Message-ID: <7vk5k733y5.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vskywadum.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vbq5k77z0.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20080312170155.GB11236@coredump.intra.peff.net> <7vtzjb34y0.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Pieter de Bie , Jeff King , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Mar 13 00:42:46 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JZaar-0004No-FH for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:42:45 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752035AbYCLXmG (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:42:06 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752325AbYCLXmF (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:42:05 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:61229 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751832AbYCLXmD (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:42:03 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 60647160E; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:42:02 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8F038160D; Wed, 12 Mar 2008 19:41:57 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Thu, 13 Mar 2008 00:30:53 +0100 (CET)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > Yes. > > In any case, most likely these objects would have been packed anyway > during that period, so they would have been pruned by the repack called by > git-gc. Yes, that is the most probable way for these unused cruft to get removed. > My patch really, really is about _unreferenced_ loose objects, i.e. > something you get by multiple "git add"s without commits. And by merge > conflicts. > > IOW by objects that were never referenced by commit objects.