From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: 1.5.4-rc2 plans Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2007 03:06:47 -0800 Message-ID: <7vk5n8b92w.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vwsr8lwf7.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <20071221104704.GC17701@artemis.madism.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Pierre Habouzit X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Dec 21 12:07:29 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J5fiy-0006UV-CC for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 12:07:28 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754497AbXLULHE (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Dec 2007 06:07:04 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754351AbXLULHC (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Dec 2007 06:07:02 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:47641 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754119AbXLULHB (ORCPT ); Fri, 21 Dec 2007 06:07:01 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 129224468; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 06:06:59 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A353A4465; Fri, 21 Dec 2007 06:06:56 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20071221104704.GC17701@artemis.madism.org> (Pierre Habouzit's message of "Fri, 21 Dec 2007 11:47:04 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Pierre Habouzit writes: > Hmm now I'm confused, I believed we settled for the: --abbrev 10 HEAD is > forbidden, --abbrev=10 HEAD works, and --abbrev HEAD too. http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/68121/focus=68659 ? > I'd also like to see any kind of form of gitcli(5) be merged for 1.5.4 > too, I believe the first version I ever sent. In the thread where I > posted the proposal using `{}` the patch introducing it is the version > formed using: Unfortunately I've been busy lately and have already discarded the whole series that had the {} stuff. Could you resend cleaned up patch please, so that I can take a look over the weekend?