From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] git-branch --with=commit Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2007 18:05:08 -0800 Message-ID: <7vk5ot7aqz.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vpryl8x5t.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Nov 08 03:05:51 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Ipwm4-0003tF-ED for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 08 Nov 2007 03:05:48 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754273AbXKHCFY (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 21:05:24 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753241AbXKHCFY (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 21:05:24 -0500 Received: from sceptre.pobox.com ([207.106.133.20]:39930 "EHLO sceptre.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752816AbXKHCFX (ORCPT ); Wed, 7 Nov 2007 21:05:23 -0500 Received: from sceptre (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by sceptre.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB1672EF; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 21:05:44 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by sceptre.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B78393637; Wed, 7 Nov 2007 21:05:42 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Thu, 8 Nov 2007 00:09:19 +0000 (GMT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > would it not be better to call it --containing=commit? Besides, I think > that the opt_parse_with_commit() function would be better named > opt_parse_commit() and be put into parse-options.[ch]. git-describe has "--contains" so that may be a better match. I do not know the particular function is generic enough to be in parse-options.