From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Makefile: create an install-symlinks target Date: Sun, 29 Jul 2007 15:15:11 -0700 Message-ID: <7vk5sin9g0.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <85lkcyvr4f.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: David Kastrup X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Jul 30 00:15:35 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IFH30-0005AM-7f for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jul 2007 00:15:34 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S964808AbXG2WPP (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:15:15 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S936593AbXG2WPO (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:15:14 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao107.cox.net ([68.230.241.39]:45062 "EHLO fed1rmmtao107.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S936586AbXG2WPN (ORCPT ); Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:15:13 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20070729221512.KZUW7349.fed1rmmtao107.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:15:12 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id VaFB1X0071kojtg0000000; Sun, 29 Jul 2007 18:15:12 -0400 In-Reply-To: <85lkcyvr4f.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> (David Kastrup's message of "Sun, 29 Jul 2007 23:26:08 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: I thought we already rejected the "install symlink" in the earlier round. Am I mistaken, or are there any compelling new reasons to revisit it?