From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] import-tars: be nice to wrong directory modes Date: Sat, 28 Apr 2007 18:07:20 -0700 Message-ID: <7vk5vwhttj.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20070429000842.GR5942@spearce.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Shawn O. Pearce" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Apr 29 03:07:27 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Hhxsr-00068K-OU for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 29 Apr 2007 03:07:26 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751943AbXD2BHX (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:07:23 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752072AbXD2BHW (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:07:22 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao105.cox.net ([68.230.241.41]:36147 "EHLO fed1rmmtao105.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751943AbXD2BHW (ORCPT ); Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:07:22 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070429010721.DSJJ22040.fed1rmmtao105.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:07:21 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id sp7L1W0021kojtg0000000; Sat, 28 Apr 2007 21:07:20 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20070429000842.GR5942@spearce.org> (Shawn O. Pearce's message of "Sat, 28 Apr 2007 20:08:42 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Shawn O. Pearce" writes: > Johannes Schindelin wrote: >> >> Some tars seem to have modes 0755 for directories, not 01000755. Do >> not generate an empty object for them, but ignore them. > > This fix is small and corrects a rather ugly repository corruption, > so I've applied it to my gfi-maint branch. Good teamplay. So you want me to pull gfi-maint to maint and gfi-master to master?