From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: FEATURE REQUEST: git-format-path: Add option to encode patch content Date: Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:28:50 -0700 Message-ID: <7vk5vxmrql.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7vslalmwcx.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <87y7kdo6pn.wl%cworth@cworth.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jari Aalto , git@vger.kernel.org To: Carl Worth X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Apr 27 23:28:57 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HhXzr-00046X-Qu for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 23:28:56 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757334AbXD0V2w (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:28:52 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1757336AbXD0V2w (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:28:52 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao107.cox.net ([68.230.241.39]:55486 "EHLO fed1rmmtao107.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757334AbXD0V2v (ORCPT ); Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:28:51 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070427212851.ZZUQ1257.fed1rmmtao107.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:28:51 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id sMUq1W0041kojtg0000000; Fri, 27 Apr 2007 17:28:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87y7kdo6pn.wl%cworth@cworth.org> (Carl Worth's message of "Fri, 27 Apr 2007 14:20:04 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Carl Worth writes: > My MUA doesn't have support (that I know of) for piping a sequence of > messages to a command. Do your MUAs? If not, how do people generally > handle long sequences of [n/N] patch emails? Are you asking _me_ specifically? Assuming so, Yes, my MUA does allow "next N messages" or "selected messages" to be given to an external program. But I typically save them in a separate mailbox for reviewing and in-editor fixups before applying, so "next N messages" are useful to me for saving but not applying.