From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git-fetch per-repository speed issues Date: Tue, 04 Jul 2006 10:45:36 -0700 Message-ID: <7vk66tgt6n.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <1151949764.4723.51.camel@neko.keithp.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: jnareb@gmail.com X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jul 04 19:46:00 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fxoxx-00053Z-ET for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 04 Jul 2006 19:45:41 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932251AbWGDRpi (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2006 13:45:38 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932257AbWGDRpi (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2006 13:45:38 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao05.cox.net ([68.230.241.34]:24501 "EHLO fed1rmmtao05.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932251AbWGDRph (ORCPT ); Tue, 4 Jul 2006 13:45:37 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao05.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060704174537.NZJB12909.fed1rmmtao05.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Tue, 4 Jul 2006 13:45:37 -0400 To: git@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: (Jakub Narebski's message of "Tue, 04 Jul 2006 17:42:12 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jakub Narebski writes: > I wonder if the problem detected here is also responsible with results > of Jeremy Blosser benchmark comparing git with Mercurial > http://lists.ibiblio.org/pipermail/sm-discuss/2006-May/014586.html > where git wins for clone, status and log, but is slower for pull. I had an impression, though the report does not talk about this specific detail, that the extra time we are paying is because the "git pull" test is done without suppressing the final diffstat phase.