From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/2] format-patch: use clear_commit_marks() instead of some adhocery Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 16:04:23 -0700 Message-ID: <7vk673h62w.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <46a038f90606261520k7df8cb3ci7a4a609644e0be12@mail.gmail.com> <46a038f90606261550p145b20a6gbe960e0abc16e8a4@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue Jun 27 01:05:34 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fv097-00012y-KB for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 27 Jun 2006 01:05:33 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030204AbWFZXEb (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:04:31 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933312AbWFZXE3 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:04:29 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao06.cox.net ([68.230.241.33]:47785 "EHLO fed1rmmtao06.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933280AbWFZXE0 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:04:26 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao06.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060626230424.WXIG6235.fed1rmmtao06.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Mon, 26 Jun 2006 19:04:24 -0400 To: Johannes Schindelin In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Tue, 27 Jun 2006 01:00:57 +0200 (CEST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: >> > Could you test with "origin..master" instead of "origin master"? >> >> Funny you mention that! Now it works ;-) and it even produces the >> patches I would expect. > > The funny thing is: I did something to account for the old syntax, but > only if you specified _one_ ref, not _two_. It would be easy, but is it > needed? (I.e. are your fingers so trained on it?) If possible I'd rather correct the two syntaxes once and for all now. Maybe accept two with a warning for deprecation?