From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [1.8.0] Remove deprecated commands Date: Thu, 10 Feb 2011 13:08:04 -0800 Message-ID: <7vlj1n38ej.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vzkqh8vqw.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <7vwrll57ha.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <4D4852EE.6080605@lsrfire.ath.cx> <20110202005748.GA13803@elie> <4D543FB4.1040709@lsrfire.ath.cx> <20110210205620.GD21144@elie> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: =?utf-8?Q?Ren=C3=A9?= Scharfe , git@vger.kernel.org To: Jonathan Nieder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Feb 10 22:08:22 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PndkU-0001SZ-AB for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 22:08:22 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757056Ab1BJVIR (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:08:17 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:34893 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757003Ab1BJVIQ (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:08:16 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 234DD457B; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:09:14 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=agRAdzYTGoL31g1iBNEi70XKiBw=; b=Tds8ny mt9+lMUdYsAFY+0Z3eYq/whax2ZN4799qWVOtRyYOoToYQHYmqYc9bARp8QkwMiJ N598mtwoE0VB1oun6qZsyk+9aqOk2yL0HmzGdzOowirQH5Gu5ox9w2W55muqgnJO Se7lwaSTxF/mmYVDTda2eFKChpMg/dRcira9M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=KNnPyT30o707KxWhUTgbqcQvbfyLjdnW XkFoh50eBIvPmKr99myxOuUTJcpg+4qoruLL+OfM2WHkL4H3XA5llIgLEoa5mOdd +3RvuyDHeAxc8GRFZnPVS5s5cWOyeCNCcMN+x5iWOGKM//St7Vd2mUEpg5FFbE3K Klu9q0nZXZw= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C16457A; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:09:10 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [76.102.170.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D4CB04579; Thu, 10 Feb 2011 16:09:06 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20110210205620.GD21144@elie> (Jonathan Nieder's message of "Thu\, 10 Feb 2011 14\:56\:20 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 0176E4E6-355A-11E0-B567-F13235C70CBC-77302942!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jonathan Nieder writes: > Ah, peek-remote and ls-remote seem to have been introduced at the same > time. ls-remote could use all git-supported protocols, while > peek-remote could only use git protocol. Yes, peek-remote was a backend for ls-remote, just like http-fetch was one of the backends for fetch.