From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] sh-setup: Write a new require_clean_work_tree function Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 08:07:43 -0700 Message-ID: <7vlj6igdds.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <1285877017-8060-1-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com> <1285877017-8060-2-git-send-email-artagnon@gmail.com> <7v4od7hsqt.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <20101001045713.GE20098@kytes> <20101001053721.GB6184@burratino> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Ramkumar Ramachandra , Git List , Joshua Jensen , Matthieu Moy To: Jonathan Nieder X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri Oct 01 17:10:15 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with smtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1hFU-0002r3-EP for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 17:10:12 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757288Ab0JAPH7 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:07:59 -0400 Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:37423 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757284Ab0JAPH5 (ORCPT ); Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:07:57 -0400 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4DC7BDB91A; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:07:56 -0400 (EDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=XKG4uOHhhHaZyAQ+6yZ0BiUD3bE=; b=Yv4w2n HNFbpTPfaH1y1kLgURn6EN7BEasCT/RNxkDaDQTONCem8Rctk7inIzciCny0+fZ0 U827Xdd3YMh0QSWYqgOjL8xTpsQ1ZCZ4LzUVfa/ZPr3FN/MVtQZY2y1fojH4q/RM wWl66TyVKytwOJ6gahYxZ8RU6rVF27EHQpuDY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=skzP5eQu23PQSvHiE20OHAhPQS8srFEP i5t4ciOdEIiE1LjYjdYxGu9PTDnKEXJvHALPf96thdU1yyPhzogx8diwOpwP6YuR 2G5sMuPF2bnfA69x6N3S36rccdIV4Mr6gBQZIS6myfv17II7EEIOF8NtkfL0eGAX M0U6QXbny3s= Received: from a-pb-sasl-quonix. (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F14DEDB918; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:07:50 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [76.102.252.155]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 10251DB917; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:07:44 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20101001053721.GB6184@burratino> (Jonathan Nieder's message of "Fri\, 1 Oct 2010 00\:37\:21 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: A8AEE1A0-CD6D-11DF-81BE-030CEE7EF46B-77302942!a-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jonathan Nieder writes: > Some noise about Cc and Reviewed-by tags: > > Checking Linux's Documentation/SubmittingPatches, I find that > that is a misuse on my part (sorry). A person passing on a patch > to Linus is rather supposed to _add_ a Cc line in the rare event > that they want to explain that a certain person had an opportunity > to comment but did not comment (so Linus can know about their > indifference to the patch, I guess). Ah, that makes sense. Thanks for an explanation.