From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Ferry Huberts <ferry.huberts@pelagic.nl>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, "Shawn O. Pearce" <spearce@spearce.org>,
David Aguilar <davvid@gmail.com>,
Markus Heidelberg <markus.heidelberg@web.de>,
Charles Bailey <charles@hashpling.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] Ensure consistent usage of mergetool.keepBackup in git
Date: Sat, 11 Apr 2009 12:23:09 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vljq7dmg2.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9a358c8b6275a7103eb036a2d1d6073bcf191e09.1239376248.git.ferry.huberts@pelagic.nl
Ferry Huberts <ferry.huberts@pelagic.nl> writes:
> In several places merge.keepBackup is used i.s.o.
> mergetool.keepBackup. This patch makes it all
> consistent for git
A silly question. The above makes it sound as if both merge.keepBackup
and mergetool.keepBackup are valid, but the latter is preferred, and your
patch makes things consistent even though without it there is nothing
broken per-se.
Is that really is the case?
Otherwise, perhaps the title and the message should read like this:
Fix misspelled mergetool.keepBackup
In several places mergetool.keepBackup was misspelled as merge.keepBackup.
Signed-off-by: Ferry Huberts <ferry.huberts@pelagic.nl>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-04-11 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-04-10 19:33 [PATCH v3 1/2] Ensure consistent usage of mergetool.keepBackup in git-gui Ferry Huberts
2009-04-10 19:33 ` [PATCH v3 2/2] Ensure consistent usage of mergetool.keepBackup in git Ferry Huberts
2009-04-11 19:23 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2009-04-11 19:41 ` Ferry Huberts (Pelagic)
2009-04-11 19:44 ` Ferry Huberts (Pelagic)
2009-04-11 20:19 ` Junio C Hamano
2009-04-12 7:04 ` Ferry Huberts (Pelagic)
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vljq7dmg2.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org \
--to=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=charles@hashpling.org \
--cc=davvid@gmail.com \
--cc=ferry.huberts@pelagic.nl \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=markus.heidelberg@web.de \
--cc=spearce@spearce.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).