From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [RFC v2] Git User's Survey 2008 Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:10:41 -0700 Message-ID: <7vljyrkqq6.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <200807230325.04184.jnareb@gmail.com> <200808200308.26308.jnareb@gmail.com> <7v4p5fqw91.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> <200808210330.44908.jnareb@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Jakub Narebski X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Aug 21 05:12:29 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KW0b7-00076r-7j for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 21 Aug 2008 05:12:29 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756014AbYHUDKv (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:10:51 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1756403AbYHUDKu (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:10:50 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:35118 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756127AbYHUDKq (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:10:46 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCCD3588DF; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:10:45 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-211.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 24189588DE; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 23:10:42 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <200808210330.44908.jnareb@gmail.com> (Jakub Narebski's message of "Thu, 21 Aug 2008 03:30:44 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: BF41915A-6F2E-11DD-BE16-B29498D589B0-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jakub Narebski writes: >> > xx. Which Git version(s) are you using? >> > (zero or more, multiple choice: >> > one can use different versions on different machines) >> > - pre 1.3, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, master, next >> > + might be important when checking "what did you find hardest" etc. >> >> This is a very good idea. "What is hardest" grouped by "How proficient >> are you with git". > > Errr... I didn't add "How proficient are you with git?" question to > Git User's Survey 2008, but I think I would. I meant that "how long have you been using" already has a strong correlation to the proficiency (iow I did not mean to suggest adding a new question). >> s/separate worktree/& (git-new-workdir)/; > > Or core.worktree. As I personally do not think there is any sane usecase that *must* use core.worktree and/or GIT_WORK_TREE, I took "separate worktree" as "having two or more worktree on the same repository via new-workdir mechanism", but you meant core.worktree. It shows the question is ill-stated that there are confusion even between us. >> > Documentation >> > >> > xx. What could be improved on the Git homepage? >> > (free form) >> > xx. What could be improved in Git documentation? >> > (free form) >> >> "What can/will you do to help improve them?"? > > Good idea. I have added this, separately for each question... Wouldn't that be an overkill?