From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] allow '%d' pretty format specifier to show decoration Date: Wed, 20 Aug 2008 12:01:39 -0700 Message-ID: <7vljyrqzn0.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20080820175325.GD27773@sigill.intra.peff.net> <20080820180034.GB32005@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff King , "MichaelTiloDressel@t-online.de" , git@vger.kernel.org To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Aug 20 21:03:29 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KVsxJ-0004vr-Su for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 21:02:54 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752723AbYHTTBu (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:01:50 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752560AbYHTTBu (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:01:50 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:63608 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752486AbYHTTBt (ORCPT ); Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:01:49 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D7E660A2E; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:01:47 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-211.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.211]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E62AE60A2A; Wed, 20 Aug 2008 15:01:41 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Wed, 20 Aug 2008 20:43:29 +0200 (CEST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 6FF71988-6EEA-11DD-A0C3-3113EBD4C077-77302942!a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > On Wed, 20 Aug 2008, Jeff King wrote: > >> There is a lot of room for discussion here. > > Indeed. When I posted a similar patch, there was some discussion, too. > But no resolution, as it seemed nobody was really interested. Why being so negative? Got up on the wrong side of the bed? People drop off of a discussion for different reasons, and it is not necessarily from total lack of interest (unless nobody responded to the initial call-for-discussion, obviously). Perhaps there were more interesting and/or pressing thing for them to think about than interaction between decorate and pretty=format at the same time. This time around, the original requestor may be more motivated and/or have time for this topic than you were motivated and/or you had time back then, and can carry the discussion forward. Let's see what happens.