From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: policy and mechanism for less-connected clients Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:26:35 -0700 Message-ID: <7vlk0su5pw.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20080626052310.GC8610@mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: David Jeske , git@vger.kernel.org To: Theodore Tso X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jun 26 07:27:41 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KBk1E-0008C4-JF for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 07:27:41 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1752800AbYFZF0o (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:26:44 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1752209AbYFZF0n (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:26:43 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:54265 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752176AbYFZF0n (ORCPT ); Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:26:43 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32E8EE4F1; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:26:42 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 996C3E4EE; Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:26:38 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20080626052310.GC8610@mit.edu> (Theodore Tso's message of "Thu, 26 Jun 2008 01:23:10 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 75A8ED5A-4340-11DD-B184-CE28B26B55AE-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Theodore Tso writes: > On Wed, Jun 25, 2008 at 11:03:02PM -0000, David Jeske wrote: >> I don't want to replicate CVS behavior, just the workflow. > > It's not clear exactly what you want. If you want the CVS workflow > (with all of its downsides), then just use "git pull; hack hack hack; > git push" all on the master branch. Eh, my point was more about "to preserve CVS workflow, fetch+rebase+push is much closer than pull+push"...