From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] hg-to-git: add --verbose option Date: Mon, 26 May 2008 10:19:25 -0700 Message-ID: <7vlk1xc7aa.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <200805261509.49841.johan@herland.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Johannes Schindelin" , "Johan Herland" , git@vger.kernel.org, "Stelian Pop" , gitster@pobox.com To: sverre@rabbelier.nl X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 26 19:20:51 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1K0gNK-0005uX-EH for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 26 May 2008 19:20:46 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1754238AbYEZRTm (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2008 13:19:42 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1754041AbYEZRTm (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2008 13:19:42 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:33860 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753876AbYEZRTl (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 May 2008 13:19:41 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 85A025440; Mon, 26 May 2008 13:19:39 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CE0F3543F; Mon, 26 May 2008 13:19:32 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: (Sverre Rabbelier's message of "Mon, 26 May 2008 15:28:54 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: EC22A73E-2B47-11DD-B156-80001473D85F-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Sverre Rabbelier" writes: > On Mon, May 26, 2008 at 3:14 PM, Johannes Schindelin > wrote: >> Now, that is not even funny, as that was my initial version, and Python >> complained about not knowing "false". > > That is because in python the keyword is "False" (note the capital 'F'). I too write True/False in my recent Python code, but I vaguely recall they were relatively new to the language. I think it was 2.3 which is probably 5 years old by now, so if that is the case we probably are safe (and they are used in p4import anyway). I think I spotted a bug in Python documentation, by the way ;-) http://docs.python.org/ref/ref.html does not even list "True" and "False" in its section 2.4 (Literals) yet, and that document is for version 2.5.2.