From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: To page or not to page Date: Thu, 01 May 2008 22:56:40 -0700 Message-ID: <7vlk2txn8n.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <70F76C0E-E16D-4047-873D-7FD19FDBB55D@sb.org> <20080502054508.GA28506@sigill.intra.peff.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Kevin Ballard , Git Mailing List To: Jeff King X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Fri May 02 07:58:02 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JroHR-0004u6-Ir for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Fri, 02 May 2008 07:58:01 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756984AbYEBF46 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 01:56:58 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1758184AbYEBF46 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 01:56:58 -0400 Received: from a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com ([207.106.133.19]:42633 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1756984AbYEBF45 (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 01:56:57 -0400 Received: from localhost.localdomain (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BF8F84D7C; Fri, 2 May 2008 01:56:55 -0400 (EDT) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-fastnet.sasl.smtp.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 112AA4D7A; Fri, 2 May 2008 01:56:51 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20080502054508.GA28506@sigill.intra.peff.net> (Jeff King's message of "Fri, 2 May 2008 01:45:09 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 91EA6D54-180C-11DD-BE45-80001473D85F-77302942!a-sasl-fastnet.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Jeff King writes: > On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 01:41:05AM -0400, Kevin Ballard wrote: > >> Does anybody have any comments or opinions about this either way? > > I agree with you; I don't like it at all. I do not care either way. As I do not have LESS defined in my environment (which makes git use its built-in that contains FX), I actually never noticed the difference before or after that patch. Hmmm, I thought I heard you cheered on that patch? Perhaps it was somebody else.