From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add more checkout tests Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 21:14:03 -0800 Message-ID: <7vlk83m8ro.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vprxfmczi.fsf@gitster.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Daniel Barkalow X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon Dec 10 06:14:40 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1J1ayU-0005sS-9d for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 06:14:38 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1750893AbXLJFOQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:14:16 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1750978AbXLJFOQ (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:14:16 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.25]:62524 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1750840AbXLJFOP (ORCPT ); Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:14:15 -0500 Received: from a-sasl-quonix (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 950753FC2; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:14:09 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (ip68-225-240-77.oc.oc.cox.net [68.225.240.77]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 19AF03FC0; Mon, 10 Dec 2007 00:14:05 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Daniel Barkalow's message of "Sun, 9 Dec 2007 23:03:28 -0500 (EST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Daniel Barkalow writes: > Of course, a patch to clean up the user experience could have a hunk that > makes the test expect that the UI is cleaned up. It's not like we can't > change our tests to accompany improvements in behavior, and I'd argue that > those hunks give a useful example of the improvement. Ok. > The point of adding these tests (and parts of tests) is that I'd forgotten > to maintain some of the important information while writing > builtin-checkout, and there wasn't a test that it was provided. While some > of the output is arbitrary informative text, there's a certain amount of > generated information there that shouldn't get lost or be incorrect. Fair enough.