From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics) Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 16:20:49 -0700 Message-ID: <7vlkg9bga6.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <11776622643106-git-send-email-junkio@cox.net> <11776622643639-git-send-email-junkio@cox.net> <7v3b2jdo9h.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org To: Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Tue May 01 01:21:27 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HifBL-0002Ok-7Y for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Tue, 01 May 2007 01:21:23 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1423775AbXD3XVJ (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:21:09 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1423780AbXD3XVI (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:21:08 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao106.cox.net ([68.230.241.40]:50995 "EHLO fed1rmmtao106.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1423775AbXD3XUx (ORCPT ); Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:20:53 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao106.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070430232052.CQOT1218.fed1rmmtao106.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:20:53 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id tbLp1W00T1kojtg0000000; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 19:20:50 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Sun, 29 Apr 2007 11:45:49 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds writes: > On Sun, 29 Apr 2007, Junio C Hamano wrote: >> >> * lt/objalloc (Mon Apr 16 22:13:09 2007 -0700) 1 commit >> - Make the object lookup hash use a "object index" instead of a >> pointer > > I think you should just drop this. Yeah. I was mostly concentrating on maint/master for the past several days, and blindly carrying it around was cheaper than deciding to drop it in my workflow.