From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] Add "stg bury" command, with the functionnality of contrib/stg-sink. Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:10:04 -0700 Message-ID: <7vlkgqlezn.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20070410182701.9362.68038.stgit@gandelf.nowhere.earth> <4625314E.2050103@vilain.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: "Sam Vilain" , "Yann Dirson" , git@vger.kernel.org To: "Catalin Marinas" X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Apr 18 02:10:13 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HdxkS-0003fg-Os for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 18 Apr 2007 02:10:13 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030949AbXDRAKI (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:10:08 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030960AbXDRAKH (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:10:07 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao107.cox.net ([68.230.241.39]:35906 "EHLO fed1rmmtao107.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030949AbXDRAKG (ORCPT ); Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:10:06 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070418001005.LLHD1257.fed1rmmtao107.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:10:05 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id oQA41W00P1kojtg0000000; Tue, 17 Apr 2007 20:10:05 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Catalin Marinas's message of "Wed, 18 Apr 2007 01:02:46 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: "Catalin Marinas" writes: > On 17/04/07, Sam Vilain wrote: >> Yann Dirson wrote: >> > This is the rewrite in python of by stg-sink written in perl. >> > >> > I changed the name to "bury" since it seems more descriptive of what >> > it does, despite being less of an opposite to "float" than "sink" was. >> >> But 'bury' means to hide or even kill. >> >> How about "raise" and "lower" ? > > Or "immerse" ("immerge"?) as another opposite of "float" :-) > > I don't have any opinion on this, it's up to Yann to argue. As a user, to me, 'bury' feels perfect and I am not annoyed by the connotation, perhaps maybe I am used to 'bury-buffer' in Emacs.