From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] --amend Rename --pretty=changelog to --pretty=gnucl Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 12:07:11 -0800 Message-ID: <7vlkie9jm8.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7vslcoghcd.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7v649icxis.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Nicolas Pitre , git@vger.kernel.org, Simon Josefsson To: Johannes Schindelin X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Mar 03 21:07:20 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HNaVi-0000MI-Gb for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 21:07:18 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751291AbXCCUHP (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Mar 2007 15:07:15 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751325AbXCCUHO (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Mar 2007 15:07:14 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao107.cox.net ([68.230.241.39]:42023 "EHLO fed1rmmtao107.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751291AbXCCUHN (ORCPT ); Sat, 3 Mar 2007 15:07:13 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao107.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.05.02.00 201-2174-114-20060621) with ESMTP id <20070303200713.RVOG2394.fed1rmmtao107.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Sat, 3 Mar 2007 15:07:13 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id WL7C1W0091kojtg0000000; Sat, 03 Mar 2007 15:07:13 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Johannes Schindelin's message of "Sat, 3 Mar 2007 15:13:19 +0100 (CET)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johannes Schindelin writes: > $ git show ':/print_wrapped_text: fix output for negative indent' I forgot that your patch is relative to 'next'. Silly me. I cannot fork a topic directly from 'next', but I always test topics in isolation first. And I forgot that this topic depended on that fix.