From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [Announce] GIT v1.5.0-rc2 Date: Wed, 24 Jan 2007 15:23:35 -0800 Message-ID: <7vlkjsdn60.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7v64b04v2e.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <17846.20498.635623.173653@lisa.zopyra.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Johannes Schindelin , Jakub Narebski , Git Mailing List , Mark Nudelman , Bill Lear To: Linus Torvalds X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Jan 25 00:23:45 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1H9rSv-0004fu-6J for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:23:41 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S932880AbXAXXXi (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:23:38 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S932883AbXAXXXi (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:23:38 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao03.cox.net ([68.230.241.36]:38506 "EHLO fed1rmmtao03.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S932880AbXAXXXh (ORCPT ); Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:23:37 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo02.cox.net ([70.169.32.72]) by fed1rmmtao03.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20070124232336.XFYP29122.fed1rmmtao03.cox.net@fed1rmimpo02.cox.net>; Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:23:36 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo02.cox.net with bizsmtp id FBPu1W00c1kojtg0000000; Wed, 24 Jan 2007 18:23:55 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Wed, 24 Jan 2007 11:21:10 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds writes: > NOTE! To see this problem, you must use the LESS environment that git > provides by default (LESS=FRSX) and not have your own environment set that > overrides the git ones (or if you do, it must have -F set). > > Is it ugly? Yes. Does it work? Yes. Do we want to apply it? You decide. I would not call it ugly. I once consiered to fork another process in between the pager and the caller here and make it buffer "the first screenful" before actually spawning the pager, or write out the short output itself without spawning, to fix the "no output but the cursor goes to the end" problem. THAT's ugly. But I do not think your patch is ugly, and it would help normal people who work in a windowed environment (I did not see the need for it myself since I usually never resize the terminal -- even working inside X my terminals are usually fixed size and are always running "screen").