From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics) Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 15:40:41 -0800 Message-ID: <7vlkkzv6rq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7vzm9g2rv5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <200612221111.58071.andyparkins@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Andy Parkins X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Dec 23 00:40:46 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by dough.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Gxu0M-0003hU-1o for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sat, 23 Dec 2006 00:40:46 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1753249AbWLVXkn (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:40:43 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1753275AbWLVXkn (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:40:43 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao10.cox.net ([68.230.241.29]:52560 "EHLO fed1rmmtao10.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753249AbWLVXkn (ORCPT ); Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:40:43 -0500 Received: from fed1rmimpo01.cox.net ([70.169.32.71]) by fed1rmmtao10.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.03 201-2131-130-104-20060516) with ESMTP id <20061222234042.DTIY20715.fed1rmmtao10.cox.net@fed1rmimpo01.cox.net>; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:40:42 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.5.247.80]) by fed1rmimpo01.cox.net with bizsmtp id 1zfz1W01b1kojtg0000000; Fri, 22 Dec 2006 18:40:00 -0500 To: git@vger.kernel.org In-Reply-To: <200612221111.58071.andyparkins@gmail.com> (Andy Parkins's message of "Fri, 22 Dec 2006 11:11:56 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Andy Parkins writes: > On Friday 2006 December 22 09:37, Junio C Hamano wrote: > >> * jc/git-add--interactive (Mon Dec 11 17:09:26 2006 -0800) 2 commits >> + git-add --interactive: hunk splitting >> + git-add --interactive > > I used this to disentangle a load of changes that I made under pressure and > turned them into lovely isolated commits. I didn't have any trouble with it, > and thought it was incredibly useful. > > I'd vote for putting it in 1.5 - it's in keeping with the usability theme - > people love interactive stuff. Seconds? Thirds? Vetoes?