From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [POOL] Who likes running Git without make install? Date: Sat, 01 Jul 2006 17:05:46 -0700 Message-ID: <7vlkrcdg6d.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7vwtb6yip5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vhd2atid1.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vd5cyt8a3.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060625010202.GX21864@pasky.or.cz> <20060625014009.GA21864@pasky.or.cz> <7vac82q6mb.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060625152157.GG21864@pasky.or.cz> <7vk674mmyo.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20060701235906.GE29115@pasky.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Jul 02 02:05:56 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FwpTE-00038Z-Eo for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 02 Jul 2006 02:05:52 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751138AbWGBAFs (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Jul 2006 20:05:48 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751163AbWGBAFs (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Jul 2006 20:05:48 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao01.cox.net ([68.230.241.38]:25233 "EHLO fed1rmmtao01.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751138AbWGBAFr (ORCPT ); Sat, 1 Jul 2006 20:05:47 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060702000547.ICPG22974.fed1rmmtao01.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Sat, 1 Jul 2006 20:05:47 -0400 To: Petr Baudis In-Reply-To: <20060701235906.GE29115@pasky.or.cz> (Petr Baudis's message of "Sun, 2 Jul 2006 01:59:06 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Petr Baudis writes: > Dear diary, on Mon, Jun 26, 2006 at 08:48:31AM CEST, I got a letter > where Junio C Hamano said that... >> I remember myself getting utterly discusted when I saw the >> inclusion of the build-time blib directory in the search path in >> some other Perl code outside git. > > Well, yes, it is ugly, but it was really cool that we could have used > Git without installing it anywhere. > > But perhaps that's just me refusing to break his old ways of doing > things. Does anyone else care about it? (And why?) > >> Worse yet, I suspect the order you do the two directories is >> wrong to prefer the freshly built one over the one you installed >> the last time, but I was trying not to stare at too much for >> health reasons so ... ;-). > > Oh man, of course you are right. :-) That's fixed in ancient past in git timescale. Why are you bringing it up again? ;-)