From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Recent unresolved issues Date: Sun, 16 Apr 2006 01:14:17 -0700 Message-ID: <7vlku6c4yu.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <7v64lcqz9j.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vlku7n05x.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vu08vjra5.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <7vk69ri5cp.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Apr 16 10:14:33 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FV2Ot-0001Co-8m for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 10:14:31 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751314AbWDPIOU (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Apr 2006 04:14:20 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751274AbWDPIOT (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Apr 2006 04:14:19 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao12.cox.net ([68.230.241.27]:8151 "EHLO fed1rmmtao12.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751314AbWDPIOT (ORCPT ); Sun, 16 Apr 2006 04:14:19 -0400 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao12.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.06.01 201-2131-130-101-20060113) with ESMTP id <20060416081418.GZTE7053.fed1rmmtao12.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Sun, 16 Apr 2006 04:14:18 -0400 To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Sat, 15 Apr 2006 10:17:05 -0700 (PDT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds writes: > Btw, I can certainly understand if you don't want to do this before 1.3.x. > Since there's no actual user-visible advantage to it, it's probably worth > dropping for now. Well, I bit the bullet, fixed-up the remaining issues I found in rev-list in your grand unified version, reverted the revert, and ported the changes for log/whatchanged/show. For now this lives in the "next" branch and _will_ not graduate before 1.3.0, of course.