From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH] send-email: address expansion for common mailers Date: Sat, 25 Mar 2006 17:30:25 -0800 Message-ID: <7vlkuyt2ku.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20060325235017.GN26071@mythryan2.michonline.com> <11433354063582-git-send-email-normalperson@yhbt.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sun Mar 26 03:30:37 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1FNK5U-0004qK-68 for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Sun, 26 Mar 2006 03:30:36 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751254AbWCZBa2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:30:28 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751261AbWCZBa2 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:30:28 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao11.cox.net ([68.230.241.28]:11741 "EHLO fed1rmmtao11.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751254AbWCZBa1 (ORCPT ); Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:30:27 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao11.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20060326013027.RHBG6244.fed1rmmtao11.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:30:27 -0500 To: Eric Wong In-Reply-To: <11433354063582-git-send-email-normalperson@yhbt.net> (Eric Wong's message of "Sat, 25 Mar 2006 17:10:06 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Eric Wong writes: > Two git repo-config keys are required for this > (as suggested by Ryan Anderson): > > sendemail.aliasesfile = > sendemail.aliasfiletype = (mutt|gnus|pine|mailrc) > > I was initially working on auto-detection, but mailrc and mutt formats > tend to throw each other off (they're alike, but handle multiple > addresses per-alias differently). I think specifying the type explicitly is probably not too much hassle for the end user, so that is fine. Now, do we want to support more than one aliases file?