From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: Comments on recursive merge.. Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2005 16:59:41 -0800 Message-ID: <7vlkzyd4aq.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> References: <20051107225807.GA10937@c165.ib.student.liu.se> <7vll00ov2l.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> <20051108210211.GA23265@c165.ib.student.liu.se> <20051108223609.GA4805@c165.ib.student.liu.se> <20051109003236.GA30496@pasky.or.cz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Wed Nov 09 02:00:36 2005 Return-path: Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1EZeJe-0001ca-VK for gcvg-git@gmane.org; Wed, 09 Nov 2005 01:59:55 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1030487AbVKIA7o (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:59:44 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1030488AbVKIA7n (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:59:43 -0500 Received: from fed1rmmtao01.cox.net ([68.230.241.38]:48299 "EHLO fed1rmmtao01.cox.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1030486AbVKIA7m (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:59:42 -0500 Received: from assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net ([68.4.9.127]) by fed1rmmtao01.cox.net (InterMail vM.6.01.05.02 201-2131-123-102-20050715) with ESMTP id <20051109005920.UNHL1668.fed1rmmtao01.cox.net@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>; Tue, 8 Nov 2005 19:59:20 -0500 To: Linus Torvalds In-Reply-To: (Linus Torvalds's message of "Tue, 8 Nov 2005 16:51:11 -0800 (PST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110004 (No Gnus v0.4) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Linus Torvalds writes: > Junio? You even wrote the comment about the case in git-merge-base, I'm > wondering whether it's a bug that we use the fast-and-cheap algorithm in > git-show-branch.. I did show-branch soon after we worked on those pathlogical merge-base fix, so I would be a bit surprised if I did it without using all the knowledge from that exercise, but I do not remember offhand. The core logic should be simple generalization of two-head merge-base to N heads.