From: Junio C Hamano <junkio@cox.net>
To: A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: git/gitweb - feature request: Add description to the branches.
Date: Wed, 07 Sep 2005 18:27:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vll281h7k.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <431DA8CD.9060009@gmail.com> (A. Large Angry's message of "Tue, 06 Sep 2005 10:33:49 -0400")
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain; charset=iso-2022-jp-2, Size: 1332 bytes --]
A Large Angry SCM <gitzilla@gmail.com> writes:
> Santi B^[.A^[Nijar wrote:
> [...]
>> One thing I'm missing is a way to describe a branch. It can
>> be
>> done in the $GIT_DIR/description, the first line for the whole
>> repository and the rest for the branches. So description file
>> for the git.git repository could be:
>> [description]
>> The core git plumbing
>> pu: Proposed updates
>> rc: Release candidate
>> todo: Todo list
>> [/description]
>> And it can be added to the gitweb tool.
>
> Having somewhere to describe the intent of a branch would be a useful
> convention. But I think the descriptions should be in separate files;
> one for each branch and one for the repository as a whole.
This reminds me of somebody else wanting to have 'motd' in
git-daemon. Once we have a common data format we could also
serve this information from there, and possibly from
'git fetch --motd'; pass that to 'git-peek-remote --motd' for git
and ssh transports, and do something else using curl for http
transport.
Anybody interested? I think the git-daemon side would be the
cleanest if we introduce a new program to format the motd
information and send it out, instead of attempting to enhance
git-upload-pack protocol; I do not think the latter can be
done in a backward compatible way.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2005-09-08 1:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2005-09-06 13:21 git/gitweb - feature request: Add description to the branches Santi Béjar
2005-09-06 14:33 ` A Large Angry SCM
2005-09-08 1:27 ` Junio C Hamano [this message]
2005-09-08 16:03 ` [RFC] GIT Repository Annotation Convention A Large Angry SCM
2005-09-08 18:00 ` Junio C Hamano
2005-09-08 18:58 ` A Large Angry SCM
2005-09-11 16:37 ` Matthias Urlichs
2005-09-11 18:08 ` A Large Angry SCM
2005-09-12 0:26 ` Horst von Brand
2005-09-13 17:46 ` Matthias Urlichs
[not found] ` <43208110.6020607@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <7vvf1bq64t.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net>
2005-09-09 14:24 ` A Large Angry SCM
[not found] ` <43207B68.5020204@citi.umich.edu>
2005-09-08 18:32 ` A Large Angry SCM
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=7vll281h7k.fsf@assigned-by-dhcp.cox.net \
--to=junkio@cox.net \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitzilla@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).