From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git send-email should not allow 'y' for in-reply-to Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2013 15:54:58 -0800 Message-ID: <7vmwwf9sx9.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <20130111212325.GA18193@sigill.intra.peff.net> <7vy5fz9xdl.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jeff King , "Matt Seitz \(matseitz\)" , "git\@vger.kernel.org" , Hilco Wijbenga To: Antoine Pelisse X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Sat Jan 12 00:55:27 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TtoRZ-0001jG-Uo for gcvg-git-2@plane.gmane.org; Sat, 12 Jan 2013 00:55:26 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1755132Ab3AKXzD (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:55:03 -0500 Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com ([208.72.237.35]:55699 "EHLO smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1754255Ab3AKXzB (ORCPT ); Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:55:01 -0500 Received: from smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CAC3BD4C; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:55:00 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=KconwfDXTplg/wNuCsuGPnfMd9Y=; b=i6sYOf FtwymvRwzKzuaWsNfqOQXimr1+s7pGC5D1fChz4FyyGBJWfZKpIra1KGO+yyVhRi t0cptosvSnYkGKTe5X7NgCqcUPRrX8BELMTnLL8LrLWDBjiQFkhiyDWTwhCz+ric 18eaePI/IH3Hl44iQO348PFAvcKSXIo4qXFWA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=GukPMyVMtkTte2nWBwn0Mxal6RrUb+nu MjkMxaHUe1/Z1pgx/ikoEtpguu+3cMWPqkfzZgPNilXz+TO95p1kGtVCxRqQTCmD WpD1FnbBsFtMFtsdesWbGqYbsBZZhCqPDzWDslyoNf4wKsP5AgAXYByUoGyaa65F 6HQbct0qfhA= Received: from b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7E131BD4A; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:55:00 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [98.234.214.94]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by b-sasl-quonix.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 0CB9FBD48; Fri, 11 Jan 2013 18:54:59 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: (Antoine Pelisse's message of "Fri, 11 Jan 2013 23:42:28 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 4F35398A-5C4A-11E2-A922-F0CE2E706CDE-77302942!b-pb-sasl-quonix.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Antoine Pelisse writes: > I would simply go for: > > What Message-ID are you replying to (if any)? > > If I don't know what to answer, I would definitely not say y/yes/n/no, > but press enter directly. Sounds sensible (even though technically you reply to a message that has that message ID, and not to a message ID ;-)). Any better phrasing from others? If not, I'd say we adopt this text. Thanks.