git.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
To: Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com>
Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Jay Soffian <jaysoffian@gmail.com>,
	Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Teach merge the '[-e|--edit]' option
Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2011 08:23:18 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <7vmxd8oopl.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m3ehyl1g5v.fsf@localhost.localdomain> (Jakub Narebski's message of "Mon, 10 Oct 2011 00:05:02 -0700 (PDT)")

Jakub Narebski <jnareb@gmail.com> writes:

> Yet another issue is if we should blindly trust automatic merge resolution.
> It is considered a good practice by some to always check (e.g. by compiling
> and possibly also running tests) the result of merge, whether it required
> merge conflict resolution or not.
>
> IIRC Linus lately said that making "git merge" automatically commit
> was one of bad design decisions of git, for the above reason...

I think your recalling this discussion

    http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1191100/focus=181362

While I agree with what Linus said in the message, I think you are not
remembering the discussion correctly. It was about bad commit _message_,
and an improvement is not to let users tweak a cleanly automerged result,
but is to allow users or force them to always write their own message,
perhaps with "merge --[no-]edit", which is exactly the point of Jay's
patch in this thread.

      parent reply	other threads:[~2011-10-10 15:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2011-10-07 15:29 [PATCH] Teach merge the '[-e|--edit]' option Jay Soffian
2011-10-07 17:30 ` Junio C Hamano
2011-10-07 18:01   ` Jay Soffian
2011-10-07 19:01     ` Junio C Hamano
2011-10-07 19:22       ` Jay Soffian
2011-10-07 19:07     ` Jay Soffian
2011-10-07 19:40       ` Junio C Hamano
2011-10-07 21:46   ` [PATCH v2] " Jay Soffian
2011-10-07 22:15     ` Junio C Hamano
2011-10-08 18:11       ` Jay Soffian
2011-10-09 23:23         ` Junio C Hamano
2011-10-10  5:29           ` Junio C Hamano
2011-10-10  7:05             ` Jakub Narebski
2011-10-10  7:50               ` Matthieu Moy
2011-10-10 15:23               ` Junio C Hamano [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=7vmxd8oopl.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org \
    --to=gitster@pobox.com \
    --cc=artagnon@gmail.com \
    --cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=jaysoffian@gmail.com \
    --cc=jnareb@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).