From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: [PATCH 14/14] wt-status.c: Initialise variable to suppress msvc warning Date: Thu, 09 Dec 2010 11:08:38 -0800 Message-ID: <7vmxoeg3wp.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <4CFA92A2.4030801@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> <20101204205206.GB3170@burratino> <4D011D30.4070405@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: Jonathan Nieder , Johannes Sixt , Erik Faye-Lund , Sebastian Schuberth , GIT Mailing-list To: Ramsay Jones X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Thu Dec 09 20:09:03 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.180.67]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PQlrR-0005hD-Vk for gcvg-git-2@lo.gmane.org; Thu, 09 Dec 2010 20:09:02 +0100 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1756325Ab0LITI4 (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:08:56 -0500 Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com ([64.74.157.62]:46509 "EHLO sasl.smtp.pobox.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1755215Ab0LITIz (ORCPT ); Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:08:55 -0500 Received: from sasl.smtp.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2213D2417; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:09:18 -0500 (EST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=oWcAAMv6MUbo0vHFqhoV7VGuqaw=; b=RxFYJe w8t5xQv+v0q3MFJVmk20FSHaSdu8nzbOT6cEcEcscGLzD8hnIHeWlb61G7CkXywE HXnAZ5QUbkb941EdQSFicnFfPc77dXMPqtO/lqb9dUv2iVyIRLpsHBV2pm4BJcSx ztN9e6AOPOh7D8XYeLAf+Pba9jXpHnLTMWedE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=pobox.com; h=to:cc:subject :references:from:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version :content-type; q=dns; s=sasl; b=dUj0H2bAgLglGlSG57H1YevRU1mFPtNL p/tPqtwcdF+5oRqaIxXazzUpCPNkhhZwA1nouXq7+/xFoY7sQQ2g57UM+18h4IU0 H+svpqplIM8YOOLkzi2ZlKbIv1qusdDjQuCxrKMGZ2VAKuumKFHKnY/Zrj0RlIuO GEO6azKtzIs= Received: from a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1ED82416; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:09:11 -0500 (EST) Received: from pobox.com (unknown [76.102.170.102]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E953E2414; Thu, 9 Dec 2010 14:09:03 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <4D011D30.4070405@ramsay1.demon.co.uk> (Ramsay Jones's message of "Thu\, 09 Dec 2010 18\:17\:20 +0000") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) X-Pobox-Relay-ID: CE5FAF66-03C7-11E0-B805-C4BE9B774584-77302942!a-pb-sasl-sd.pobox.com Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Ramsay Jones writes: > Junio, could you please drop patches 5-14 from the series; the first four patches > are the important ones and I'd rather they didn't get held up. Thanks! Have these four patches been Acked by interested parties? I think I saw 1/N and 2/N acked by Erik and 4/N acked by SSchuberth and J6t, but any words on 3/N? Not that I deeply care nor have environment to test changes to [3/N], but I am wondering if these need conditional definition to futureproof (e.g. what happens when the header you are using the definition _I64_MIN from, or some other headers, started defining these constats?).