From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Junio C Hamano Subject: Re: git submodule update --merge Date: Mon, 25 May 2009 11:33:31 -0700 Message-ID: <7vmy91vxqc.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> References: <7vab5ci281.fsf@alter.siamese.dyndns.org> <200905191526.40471.johan@herland.net> <200905251359.37619.johan@herland.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: git@vger.kernel.org, Johannes Schindelin , markus.heidelberg@web.de, Peter Hutterer To: Johan Herland X-From: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Mon May 25 20:33:39 2009 Return-path: Envelope-to: gcvg-git-2@gmane.org Received: from vger.kernel.org ([209.132.176.167]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1M8ezT-0003lA-2i for gcvg-git-2@gmane.org; Mon, 25 May 2009 20:33:39 +0200 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1751789AbZEYSdc (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2009 14:33:32 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S1751596AbZEYSdb (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2009 14:33:31 -0400 Received: from fed1rmmtao105.cox.net ([68.230.241.41]:53337 "EHLO fed1rmmtao105.cox.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751453AbZEYSda (ORCPT ); Mon, 25 May 2009 14:33:30 -0400 Received: from fed1rmimpo03.cox.net ([70.169.32.75]) by fed1rmmtao105.cox.net (InterMail vM.7.08.02.01 201-2186-121-102-20070209) with ESMTP id <20090525183331.MJNU20430.fed1rmmtao105.cox.net@fed1rmimpo03.cox.net>; Mon, 25 May 2009 14:33:31 -0400 Received: from localhost ([68.225.240.211]) by fed1rmimpo03.cox.net with bizsmtp id vuZX1b00M4aMwMQ04uZXeY; Mon, 25 May 2009 14:33:31 -0400 X-Authority-Analysis: v=1.0 c=1 a=CeZos8cfAAAA:8 a=ReBJqpTY1bjq0GCCw7gA:9 a=2FDTgvvF2hulF8fkRGhkcyeHdc4A:4 a=8lZzlOcxvREA:10 X-CM-Score: 0.00 In-Reply-To: <200905251359.37619.johan@herland.net> (Johan Herland's message of "Mon\, 25 May 2009 13\:59\:37 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux) Sender: git-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: git@vger.kernel.org Archived-At: Johan Herland writes: > I haven't received any replies to my attempt to describe the context in > which "git submodule update --merge" is useful. A hint as to whether my > argument is valid, or just crap, would be nice. FWIW, I didn't find "rebase makes sense but merge doesn't" argument very convincing to begin with. Because the configuration variable is about "update" action, I agree it makes sense to do > submodule..update = checkout/rebase (checkout if unset) from the UI standpoint. I do not know what the sensible repertoire of options nor what the default should be, though. That's up to the submodule using people to sort out.